Generic security policy templates fail two tests: they don't match how your team actually works, and they don't match what your auditor will check. We write policies and procedures that match both — defensible documentation built for your specific environment.
What are Information Security Policies & Procedures?
Information security policies and procedures are the documented rules that define how your organization handles security: what’s required, what’s prohibited, who’s accountable, what to do when something goes wrong. They’re the difference between a security program that scales and one that depends on the institutional knowledge of one person.
A complete policy library covers the umbrella security policy plus specific topic-area policies (access control, acceptable use, incident response, etc.) plus the operating procedures that translate each policy into actionable guidance.
Why generic templates fail
Most organizations approach policy by downloading a template pack from SANS, NIST, or a compliance vendor — then editing the company name in the headers. The result is a binder full of documents that:
- Reference controls you don’t implement — your policy says multi-factor authentication is required for all systems, but your finance system still uses passwords. Auditor flags this. Fast.
- Miss controls you do implement — your team has a robust change- management process for production deploys, but it’s not in the policy. Auditor concludes you don’t have change management.
- Use language nobody on your team uses — the policy says “data custodian” but your team says “system owner”; the policy uses formal escalation paths your team doesn’t recognize.
- Get treated as fiction — when the gap between documented policy and operational reality is too large, the documents become artifacts produced for audits, not guidance anyone actually follows.
The fix isn’t more templates. It’s policies built around how your organization actually works, formalized to satisfy regulatory and operational needs.
CyberBullet’s approach
1. Current-State Documentation
Before drafting anything, we document what you actually do today — through stakeholder interviews, observation, and review of existing informal procedures. The output is a baseline of operational reality that the new policies will formalize.
2. Regulatory Mapping
We map your organization’s specific regulatory obligations against the control areas they cover. This determines which policies are required versus optional, which controls each policy must address, and what evidence each policy will need to support.
3. Policy Drafting
We draft the policies in language that matches how your team actually works. Acceptable use policy uses your tooling names and your real workflows. Access control policy reflects your actual identity systems and approval flows. Incident response policy aligns with your real escalation paths.
4. Operating Procedure Development
For each policy, we develop the operating procedures that turn the policy into action — the step-by-step “how do you actually do this” documentation. Procedures are where policies stop being theoretical and start being usable by the team that has to follow them.
5. Stakeholder Review
Policies get reviewed by the people who will actually have to follow them — not just the security team. Operations reviews operational procedures. Engineering reviews technical standards. Legal reviews incident response. Multiple review cycles ensure the documents are both rigorous and realistic.
6. Approval & Rollout
Each finalized policy goes through your formal approval process (typically the security steering committee + executive sign-off), gets versioned and stored in your document management system, and gets communicated to affected employees through your established channels.
Typical policy library
Core policies (most organizations):
- Information Security Policy (the umbrella)
- Acceptable Use Policy
- Access Control Policy
- Identification & Authentication Standard
- Encryption Standard
- Change Management Policy
- Incident Response Policy
- Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Policy
- Data Classification Policy
- Data Retention Policy
- Vendor / Third-Party Management Policy
- Security Awareness & Training Policy
- Asset Management Policy
- Physical Security Policy
Additional policies (compliance-driven or operational complexity):
- Mobile Device Policy / BYOD Policy
- Remote Work Security Policy
- Cloud Security Policy
- Software Development Lifecycle Policy
- Cryptographic Key Management Policy
- Logging & Monitoring Policy
- Privileged Access Management Policy
- Privacy Policy (if not covered by legal team)
Frameworks we map policies to
- NIST SP 800-53 — control families and policy requirements
- ISO 27001 Annex A — controls requiring documented policies
- HIPAA Security Rule — administrative safeguards
- PCI DSS 4.0 — Requirement 12 (information security policy)
- SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria — CC1.1, CC1.2 (control environment)
- NIST CSF 2.0 — Govern function (GV.PO — Policies)
Who this is for
- Organizations preparing for SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HITRUST certification — formal documented policies are required
- Companies whose policies are 5+ years old — significant operational drift since the last update, audit risk growing
- Post-incident organizations rebuilding policy frameworks after finding gaps in incident response
- Companies in M&A consolidating two distinct policy frameworks into one
- Mid-market organizations growing past the point where security could run on tribal knowledge
Our methodology
Every engagement runs through the same six phases. Manual validation isn't a finishing step — it's the product.
Scope & Authorize
We define the engagement boundary precisely before testing starts — in-scope assets, out-of-bounds targets, testing windows, and emergency-stop procedures.
- Written authorization letters exchanged before any packet leaves our infrastructure
- Signal / Slack channel established for real-time findings during the engagement
- Explicit rules of engagement reviewed with legal, IT, and business stakeholders
Passive Reconnaissance
Before a single packet touches your infrastructure, we map your external footprint using public sources only — DNS, CT logs, code repos, internet-wide scan data.
- Typically discovers 15-30% more attack surface than the client originally provided
- Certificate transparency, BGP, and GitHub exposure reporting
- OSINT profile for social engineering vectors if in scope
Active Discovery
We enumerate live services across in-scope assets — ports, software versions, auth mechanisms, and protocol configurations — correlated against current vuln data.
- Hand-tuned scanning profiles — not the default Nessus run
- Protocol-level inspection for TLS, SSH, SMB, Kerberos, LDAP
- Service fingerprinting to ground truth before any exploitation
Manual Validation
Every potential issue is validated by hand before it makes the report. No CVE-dumping. No false positives. This is what separates the engagement from a scan.
- Manual exploitation attempts for any finding of High severity or above
- Business-logic testing on top of the technical layer
- Chained vulnerabilities analyzed as a single attack path
Exploitation & Impact
For confirmed vulnerabilities with attacker value, we attempt exploitation to prove impact — not just that a CVE applies, but what it gets you.
- Proof-of-exploit captured for every confirmed critical finding
- Pivot paths mapped to the actual crown-jewel data
- Interim notification inside 24 hours for anything critical
Report & Remediate
Every finding is paired with severity rated on real exploitability, reproducible proof-of-exploit, and remediation guidance your team can ship this sprint.
- Executive summary and technical deep-dive in a single report
- Findings mapped to CIS, NIST CSF, and relevant compliance families
- Retest included — we confirm the fix before we close the finding
What you walk away with
Frameworks we map to
Findings ship mapped to the control families your regulators and auditors actually check. Governance clients use these crosswalks directly in their program documentation.
- CIS Controls v8
- NIST CSF 2.0 / 800-53
- PCI DSS 4.0
- HIPAA Security Rule
- SOC 2 Type II
- OWASP ASVS
Questions we get asked
Can't we just download a template pack?
You can, and many organizations do — and then fail their first audit. Generic templates fail two ways: they include controls you don't implement (auditor flags discrepancy between policy and reality), and they miss controls you do implement (you're holding yourself to a lower standard than your actual operations). Custom policies match what you actually do, then formalize it.
Which policies do we actually need?
Depends on your regulatory obligations and operational complexity. Most organizations need at minimum: information security policy (the umbrella), acceptable use, access control, incident response, change management, vendor management, business continuity, and data classification. Compliance-driven organizations add: data retention, breach notification, security awareness, system hardening standards. We'll recommend a specific document set during scoping.
How long does this take?
A complete policy library build typically runs 6-10 weeks: 2-3 weeks of stakeholder interviews and current-state documentation, 3-4 weeks of drafting, 1-2 weeks of review cycles, and a week of finalization and rollout. Updates and refreshes of existing policy libraries are faster (2-4 weeks).
How do we keep policies current after they're written?
We build a review framework into the deliverable: each policy has an owner, a review frequency (typically annual), a defined change-control process for updates, and a deprecation process for retired policies. We can also handle annual reviews as a separate engagement — bringing fresh eyes to evaluate drift between policy and operational reality.
Do you handle the rollout and training, or just the documents?
Both, depending on what you need. Document delivery is the core scope. Rollout support (employee communication, manager training, integration with onboarding flows, attestation tracking) is available as additional scope. Most clients handle rollout themselves with our templates; some prefer fully-managed rollout for change management reasons.